Chisholm v. USA

Petitioner: Craig John Chisholm
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 1:2020cv00072
Filed: June 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Ted Stewart
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2020 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Related case: 1:10cr00084 TS. No filing fee required. AUSA added to the case: Yes. filed by Craig John Chisholm. Assigned to Judge Ted Stewart (rks)
June 19, 2020 Case Stayed per General Order 20-018.(rks)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chisholm v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: David F. Backman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Craig John Chisholm
Represented By: Benjamin C. McMurray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?