Tanner v. Walmart
Plaintiff: Michelle Tanner
Defendant: Walmart
Case Number: 1:2020cv00094
Filed: July 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Jared C Bennett
Referring Judge: Howard C Nielson
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 4/28/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 4/28/2021. Discovery due by 11/30/2021. Motions due by 1/10/2022. Deadline for filing a request for a scheduling conference with the District Judge for the purpose of setting a trial date if no dispositive motions are filed is due by 1/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/12/2020. (lnp)
August 11, 2020 Filing 8 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Rice, Mitchel)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/10/2020. (lnp)
August 10, 2020 Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Walmart. (Rice, Mitchel)
August 7, 2020 Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Walmart.(Rice, Mitchel)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 8/4/2020. (lnp)
August 3, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Michelle Tanner, Defendant Walmart. (dw)
July 31, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 2nd District Court Weber County, case number 200904224, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AUTDC-3668040) filed by Walmart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (Rice, Mitchel)
July 31, 2020 Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendant Walmart is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (dw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tanner v. Walmart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart
Represented By: Andrea M. Keysar
Represented By: Marianne Schumann
Represented By: Mitchel T. Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Tanner
Represented By: Parker A. Allred
Represented By: Alan D. Tucker
Represented By: Colby B. Vogt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?