Tanner v. Walmart
Michelle Tanner |
Walmart |
1:2020cv00094 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Jared C Bennett |
Howard C Nielson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 4/28/2021. Joinder of Parties due by 4/28/2021. Discovery due by 11/30/2021. Motions due by 1/10/2022. Deadline for filing a request for a scheduling conference with the District Judge for the purpose of setting a trial date if no dispositive motions are filed is due by 1/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/12/2020. (lnp) |
Filing 8 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Rice, Mitchel) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen (14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 8/10/2020. (lnp) |
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Defendant Walmart. (Rice, Mitchel) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Walmart.(Rice, Mitchel) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. on 8/4/2020. (lnp) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Michelle Tanner, Defendant Walmart. (dw) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 2nd District Court Weber County, case number 200904224, (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number AUTDC-3668040) filed by Walmart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) Assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr (Rice, Mitchel) |
Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr. Defendant Walmart is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 400.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (dw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tanner v. Walmart | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walmart | |
Represented By: | Andrea M. Keysar |
Represented By: | Marianne Schumann |
Represented By: | Mitchel T. Rice |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michelle Tanner | |
Represented By: | Parker A. Allred |
Represented By: | Alan D. Tucker |
Represented By: | Colby B. Vogt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.