Foulger v. Utah, State of
| Edward Clarence Foulger |
| Utah, State of |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 1:2020cv00103 |
| August 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Petitioner Edward Clarence Foulger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 4
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 Fee Status: IFP. (Originally received on 08/10/2020) filed by Edward Clarence Foulger. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Appeals: Order of Reversal and Remand to Modify Sentence, #2 Supplement Memorandum in Support, #3 Supplement Letter, #4 Envelope 1) Assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball (dw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/10/2020: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (dw).
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 09/09/2020. (dw)
|
|
Filing 2
*** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Edward Clarence Foulger received from Correctional Institution (dw)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M Romero for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 08/10/2020) filed by Petitioner Edward Clarence Foulger. (dw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
