Lawley v. USA
| Dajuan Michele Lawley |
| USA |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 1:2020cv00150 |
| November 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING IFP APPLICATION - denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's application to proceed without payment of the five-dollar filing fee is DENIED. Plaintiff has thirty days to remit five dollars to open this case. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 12/17/20. (jrj)
|
|
Filing 3
*** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Dajuan Michele Lawley received from Correctional Institution. (jwt)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER that within thirty days Petitioner must file a certificate from the warden or other appropriate officer of the place of confinement showing the amount of money or securities that the petitioner has in any account in the institution Signed by Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett on 11/16/2020. (jl)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 11/05/2020). (dw)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
