Capati v. Saul
| Shawn S. Capati |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Notice |
| 1:2021cv00014 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Jared C Bennett |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by Plaintiff Shawn S. Capati, Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (alf) |
| Filing 10 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Shawn S. Capati. (alf) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE REMINDER - All parties are requested to respond within the time frame set forth in the #7 Notice of Presiding Magistrate Assignment, pursuant to General Order 07-001. If you have already consented/objected, please disregard this notice. No judge will be informed of a party's response unless all parties have consented to the assignment of the matter to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Unless consents from all parties are received within fifteen(15) days, the case will be randomly re-assigned to a U.S. District Judge without further notice.# Link to Magistrate Consent Objection form (alf) |
| Filing 8 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (alf) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 15 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Shawn S. Capati, Defendant Andrew M. Saul. Form due by 2/25/2021. (alf) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda A. Berndt on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Berndt, Amanda) |
| Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Attorney General of the United States. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Office of Regional Chief Counsel. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to United States Attorney's Office. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (jl) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-3906205) filed by Shawn S. Capati. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Social Security Disability Claim) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett (Reichardt, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. Plaintiff Shawn S. Capati is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (jl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
