Hansen v. Saul
David Niels Hansen |
Andrew Saul |
SSA Notice |
1:2021cv00051 |
April 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Cecilia M Romero |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by Plaintiff David Niels Hansen per attached consent form, Defendant Andrew Saul per General Order 21-005. (alf) |
Filing 11 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff David Niels Hansen. (alf) |
Filing 10 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 21 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff David Niels Hansen. Form due by 5/19/2021. (alf) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda A. Berndt on behalf of Andrew Saul (Berndt, Amanda) |
Filing 8 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as United States Attorney's Office. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to United States Attorney General. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 04/09/2021. (nmt) Modified to correct filing date on 4/12/2021 (nmt). |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul (Originally received by the court on 04/09/2021). (Filing fee $ 0) (Fee Status: IFP) filed by David Niels Hansen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (nmt) |
Filing 3 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 04/09/2021) filed by Plaintiff David Niels Hansen. (nmt) |
Filing 2 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Judge Tena Campbell no longer assigned to the case. Case number will now read 1:21-cv-00051-CMR. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (nl) |
Filing 1 STRICKEN- DISREGARD Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Plaintiff David Niels Hansen is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (nmt) Modified on 4/9/2021 stricken, filed in error parties to disregard (nl). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.