Apodaca v. Reese et al
Joaquin Louis Apodaca |
FNU Hansen, Phillip Reese and FNU Calder |
Prisoner Litigation Unit |
1:2021cv00077 |
May 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Jill N Parrish |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against FNU Calder, FNU Hansen, Phillip Reese (Originally received by the court on 05/26/2021). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Joaquin Louis Apodaca. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #2 Envelope 1) Assigned to Judge Jill N. Parrish (nmt) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: TBD. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file with the Court a certified copy of his inmate trust account statements. Collection of Fees Sent: Yes Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 06/02/2021. (nmt) |
Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, and Envelope. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #2 Envelope 1)(nmt) |
Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 05/26/2021) filed by Plaintiff Joaquin Louis Apodaca. (nmt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.