Murphy v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
| Anthony Charles Murphy |
| Robert Powell and Utah Department of Corrections |
| Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 1:2021cv00097 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Letter to the Judge re: Motion to Appoint Counsel no. 2. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kpf)
|
|
Filing 3
Modification of Docket: Error: Petitioner's Brief was not included in original entry. Correction: Attached Brief. re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2254. (nmt)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel and Memorandum in Support filed by Petitioner Anthony Charles Murphy. (nmt)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 4681095020) Fee Status: Paid. (Originally received on 07/01/2021) filed by Anthony Charles Murphy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) Assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby (nmt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2021: #4 Brief of Petitioner for 2254) (nmt).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
