Martinez v. Nissan North America
Plaintiff: Leroy Martinez
Defendant: Nissan North America
Case Number: 1:2021cv00157
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: David Barlow
Referring Judge: Dustin B Pead
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File re #13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support. Replies due by 2/18/2022. Responses due by 3/11/2022. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 01/18/2022. (jl)
January 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION re #13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support to extend briefing schedule by Leroy Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rose, Adam) Modified by correcting event on 1/18/2022 (jl).
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendant Nissan North America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Warranty Manual, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(McOmber, Elisabeth)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint - Defendant's answer, motion, or other response will be due by December 21, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/13/2021. (jl)
December 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Defendant Nissan North America. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Dustin B. Pead.(McOmber, Elisabeth)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff(s) must propose a discovery schedule to defendant(s) in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report at least within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 12/08/2021. (jl)
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 12/7/21. (ep)
December 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Adam Rose for Leroy Martinez.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 12/06/2021. (jl)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Adam Rose , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-4181930,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Plaintiff Leroy Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Hosman, Justin)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Amir Nassihi for Nissan North America.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html. Instructions are available at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing.Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/rules-practice. Signed by Judge David Barlow on 12/1/2021. (jl)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Amir Nassihi , Registration fee $ 250, receipt number AUTDC-4176723,Attorneys awaiting Pro Hac Vice admission should immediately register to efile and receive electronic notification of case activity in the District of Utah at #https://www.pacer.uscourts.gov/cmecf/dcbk.html.Registration requests will not be approved until the court has granted the pro hac vice motion. Instructions are available on the court's website at #https://www.utd.uscourts.gov/cmecf-electronic-case-filing. filed by Defendant Nissan North America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Application for Admission PHV_Nassihi, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(McOmber, Elisabeth)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Adam Rose, for Plaintiff Leroy Martinez. (mh)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant Nissan North America identifying Nissan Motor Co., Ltd as Corporate Parent. (McOmber, Elisabeth)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from First Judicial District Court, Box Elder County, case number 210100149, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4173693) filed by Nissan North America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Coversheet, #2 Affidavit of Elisabeth M. McOmber in support of Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit A to Affidavit of Elisabeth M. McOmber in support of Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit B to Affidavit of Elisabeth M. McOmber in support of Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit C to Affidavit of Elisabeth M. McOmber in support of Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit D to Affidavit of Elisabeth M. McOmber in support of Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit E to Affidavit of Elisabeth M. McOmber in support of Notice of Removal, #8 Exhibit F to Affidavit of Elisabeth M. McOmber in support of Notice of Removal, #9 Exhibit G to Affidavit of Elisabeth M. McOmber in support of Notice of Removal) Assigned to Judge David Barlow (McOmber, Elisabeth)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge David Barlow. Defendant Nissan North America is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (mh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez v. Nissan North America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leroy Martinez
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Steele
Represented By: Justin Martin Hosman
Represented By: Adam Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nissan North America
Represented By: Elisabeth M. McOmber
Represented By: Stephanie N. Nielson
Represented By: Amir Nassihi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?