Gollaher v. State of Utah
| Scott Logan Gollaher |
| State of Utah |
| Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit |
| 1:2022cv00017 |
| February 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Letter to court. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (jl) |
Filing 4
ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 2/7/2022. (af)
|
| Filing 3 *** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Scott Logan Gollaher received from Correctional Institution. (mh) |
| Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Petition for 2254, Declaration of Petitioner, Exhibit A, Civil Cover Sheet and Envelope. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Petitioner, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Motion to Stay, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Envelope)(mh) |
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 2/4/2022) filed by Petitioner Scott Logan Gollaher. (af) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
