Zampedri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
| Dana Michelle Zampedri |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Agency, Layton Police Department and Clinton Police Department |
| 1:2022cv00031 |
| February 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #4 Complaint filed by Dana Michelle Zampedri. The Court recommends dismissal of Plaintiff's action with prejudice for frivolousness or "failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Copies of this Report and Recommendation are being sent to all parties who are hereby notified of their right to object. Within fourteen (14) days of being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Failure to object may constitute a waiver of objections upon subsequent review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/18/2022. (eat)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(B), Magistrate to handle case up to and including R&R on all dispositive matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 4/4/2022. (eat)
|
|
Filing 8
The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment Form has now passed. The party failed to file, therefore the case is ineligible for magistrate presider assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball as presider and Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead as (b)1(B) referral judge. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assigned to the case as presider. (alf)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 3/8/22. (alf)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE to Pro Se Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. To consent or request reassignment, use # the form on this link or use the included form for non-efilers and send it toconsents@utd.uscourts.govwithin 28 days or mail to the court with Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Dana Michelle Zampedri. Form due by 3/31/2022. (alf)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Dana Michelle Zampedri. (mh)
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Originally received by the court on 02/25/2022). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Dana Michelle Zampedri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1, #2 Envelope 1) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead (mh)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 03/01/2022. (mh)
|
|
Filing 2
DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, Motion for Appointment of Counsel, Summons, Civil Cover Sheet and Envelope. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, #2 Summons-More than One Defendant, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope)(mh)
|
|
Filing 1
**SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 02/25/2022) filed by Plaintiff Dana Michelle Zampedri. (mh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
