Old Dominion Freight Line v. Infuze et al
Plaintiff: Old Dominion Freight Line
Defendant: Infuze and Daniel K. Noall
Case Number: 1:2022cv00064
Filed: May 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Nature of Suit: Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Cause of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 14706 Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act / Liability of Carriers - Receipts & Bills
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Old Dominion Freight Line as to Daniel K. Noall served on 6/16/2022, answer due 7/7/2022. (Baxter, Stevan)
June 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Old Dominion Freight Line as to Infuze served on 5/20/2022, answer due 6/10/2022. (Baxter, Stevan)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Daniel K. Noall. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Infuze. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4329651) filed by Old Dominion Freight Line. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit Exhibit D) Assigned to Judge Tena Campbell (Baxter, Stevan)
May 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Judge Tena Campbell. Plaintiff Old Dominion Freight Line is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (af)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Old Dominion Freight Line v. Infuze et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Old Dominion Freight Line
Represented By: Stevan R. Baxter
Represented By: Stephen M. Bigham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Infuze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel K. Noall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?