Tippetts v. State Collection Service
| Jack Tippetts |
| State Collection Service |
| 1:2022cv00087 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Ted Stewart |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/2/2022. (tlc)
|
| Filing 14 The deadline for submission of Consent/Reassignment forms has now passed. One or more of the parties failed to file, therefore the case is ineligible for magistrate assignment. Case randomly assigned to Judge Ted Stewart. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned to the case. (alf) |
| Filing 13 REPORT OF ATTORNEY PLANNING MEETING. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Scheduling Order)(Stephenson, Eric) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #10 Certificate of Service. The document is stricken as improperly filed and motion #11 is terminated. Counsel is also reminded that when submitting motions, proposed orders also need to be included as a PDF attachment to motions. A Word version must also be emailed directly to chambers. (alf) |
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike #10 Certificate of Service and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Jack Tippetts. (Stephenson, Eric) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by State Collection Service Defendant's Rule 68 Offer of Judgment (Bean, Tanner) Modified on 8/19/2022 - stricken as improperly filed per chambers (alf). |
| Filing 9 RECEIVED Consent/Reassignment Form from Plaintiff Jack Tippetts. (alf) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return #the form on this link To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not file the Consent Form in the case.Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendant State Collection Service, Plaintiff Jack Tippetts. Form due by 8/30/2022. (alf) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendant State Collection Service, Plaintiff Jack Tippetts. (alf) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT under FRCP 7.1 filed by Defendant State Collection Service. (Bean, Tanner) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint filed by State Collection Service. Attorney Tanner J. Bean added to party State Collection Service (pty:dft)(Bean, Tanner) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 7/6/22. (alf)
|
| Filing 3 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to State Collection Service. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (mh) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4382559) filed by Jack Tippetts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (Stephenson, Eric) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Plaintiff Jack Tippetts is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tippetts v. State Collection Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jack Tippetts | |
| Represented By: | Eric Stephenson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State Collection Service | |
| Represented By: | Tanner J. Bean |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
