Context Directions v. Oy et al
| Context Directions |
| Suunto Oy and Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor |
| 1:2022cv00106 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #3 Complaint,. Answer deadline updated for Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor to 12/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 9/12/2022. (alf)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Bradley T. Fox, for Defendant Suunto Oy. (alf) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Context Directions as to Suunto Oy Waiver sent on 9/9/2022, answer due 11/8/2022. (Pia, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Plaintiff Context Directions. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Extension of Time)(Pia, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Context Directions as to Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor served on 8/19/2022, answer due 9/9/2022. (Pia, Joseph) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - Plaintiff must propose a schedule to defendant in the form of a draft Attorney Planning Meeting Report within the earlier of fourteen(14) days after any defendant has appeared or twenty-eight (28) days after any defendant has been served with the complaint. See order for additional instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 08/18/2022. (mh)
|
| Filing 5 Report on the Filing of an action sent to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (ks) |
| Filing 4 **RESTRICTED DOCUMENT**Summons Issued Electronically as to Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (haa) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Amer Sports Winter & Outdoor, Suunto Oy (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4420561) filed by Context Directions. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-1 - US Patent No. 10,142,791, #3 Exhibit A-2 - US Patent No. 9,807,564, #4 Exhibit A3 - US Patent No. 11,057,738, #5 Exhibit B1 - Claim Chart for Infringement for 791 Patent, #6 Exhibit B2 - Claim Chart for Infringement for 564 Patent, #7 Exhibit B3 - Claim Chart for Infringement for 738 Patent, #8 Exhibit C - Ad re Suunto 9 Peak, #9 Exhibit D - Ad re Suunto 9 Peak, #10 Exhibit E - Ad re Suunto 9 Peak, #11 Exhibit F - User Manual) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead (Pia, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS for appearance phv mailed to attorney Kirk J Anderson, for Plaintiff Context Directions (ks) (ks). |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead. Plaintiff Context Directions is directed to E-File the Complaint and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to utdecf_clerk@utd.uscourts.gov for issuance. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
