Spitzer v. Stepstone Connect et al
| Nancy Spitzer |
| Stepstone Connect and Sherryann Quindley |
| 1:2022cv00168 |
| December 14, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| David Barlow |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal #2 ) with Jury Demand filed by Sherryann Quindley, Stepstone Connect. (Deiss, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. The case is randomly reassigned to Judge David B. Barlow as the presiding judge and automatically referred to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A). Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero is no longer assigned as the presiding judge.(alf) |
Filing 7
ORDER TO PROPOSE SCHEDULE - See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 1/4/2023. (mh)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. Defendants have up to and including January 18, 2023, to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 1/4/2023. (mh)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Defendants Sherryann Quindley, Stepstone Connect. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Deiss, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Sherryann Quindley, Stepstone Connect, Plaintiff Nancy Spitzer. Form due by 1/5/2023. (alf) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ADR, e-mailed or mailed to Defendants Sherryann Quindley, Stepstone Connect, Plaintiff Nancy Spitzer. (ks) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 2nd District Court Davis County, case number 220700965, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AUTDC-4531068) filed by Sherryann Quindley, Stepstone Connect. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Verified Complaint and Exhibits, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Documents from State Court Case, #4 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (Sell, Sydney) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. Defendants Sherryann Quindley, Stepstone Connect is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 402. by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (ks) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
