Williams v. Arbon et al
Plaintiff: Curtis Scott Williams
Defendant: Ryan Arbon, Phillip Reese, Zachary Campbell, Chelsey Roth and Stacey LNU
Not Classified By Court: Prisoner Litigation Unit
Case Number: 1:2022cv00175
Filed: December 30, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Presiding Judge: Cecilia M Romero
Referring Judge: Ted Stewart
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 7.77 received, receipt number 1395 (ks)
February 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CONSENT TO COLLECTION OF FEES from Inmate Trust Account filed by Curtis Scott Williams. (jl) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/27/2023: #1 rescanned for missing page) (kb).
February 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re #1 MOTION - Though the Court has already granted Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff must still eventually pay $350.00, the full amount of the filing fee. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $7.77 within thirty days of the date of this Order, or the complaint will be dismissed. Plaintiff must make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's account. Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangement to give a copy of this Order to the inmate funds accounting office at Plaintiff's correctional facility. Plaintiff shall complete the consent to collection of fees and submit it to the inmate funds accounting office at Plaintiff's correctional facility and also submit a copy of the signed consent to this Court within thirty days from the date of this Order, or the complaint will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 02/02/2023. (jl)
February 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 *** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Curtis Scott Williams received from Correctional Institution. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). (jl)
January 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. The case is randomly reassigned to Judge Ted Stewart as the presiding judge. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero is no longer assigned as the presiding judge. The case is automatically referred to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B).(alf)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of impecuniosity of Curtis Williams filed by Curtis Scott Williams. (jl)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 COMPLAINT against Ryan Arbon, Zachary Campbell, Stacey LNU, Phillip Reese, Chelsey Roth (Originally received by the court on 12/30/2022). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Curtis Scott Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero (haa)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Initial Partial fee: TBD. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file with the Court a certified copy of his inmate trust account statements. Collection of Fees Sent: No. Denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying #6 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 01/06/2023. (haa)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION for Service of Process (Prisoner). Summons to be served on: Ryan Arbor, Phillip Reese, Zachary Campbell, Chelsey Roth, Stacey LNU. Filed by Plaintiff Curtis Scott Williams. (haa)
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Curtis Scott Williams. (haa)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to Plaintiff - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Curtis Scott Williams. Form due by 1/26/2023. (mh)
December 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint, motions, civil cover sheet and envelopes. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Motion Appointment of Counsel, #2 Motion Service of Process, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelopes 1, 2 and 5)(haa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2023: #5 Envelope Letter) (haa).
December 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 *** Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement for Curtis Scott Williams received from Correctional Institution (haa)
December 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero for review, case file forwarded to PLU. (Received by the court on: 12/30/2022) filed by Plaintiff Curtis Scott Williams. (haa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Arbon et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis Scott Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Arbon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Phillip Reese
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zachary Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chelsey Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stacey LNU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: Prisoner Litigation Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?