Bradford v. Taylor et al
| Slyvester Bradford and Sylvester Bradford |
| Devin Taylor, Ogden City Police Department, Ogden City, D. Rentmeiste, T. Dupre, J. Gerfen and J. Nielsen |
| 1:2024cv00030 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Dale A Kimball |
| Daphne A Oberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants T. Dupre, J. Gerfen, J. Nielsen, Ogden City, Ogden City Police Department, D. Rentmeiste, Devin Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Body Cam Footage Exhibit Link) Motions referred to Daphne A. Oberg. Attorney Brandon T. Crowther added to party T. Dupre(pty:dft), Attorney Brandon T. Crowther added to party J. Gerfen(pty:dft), Attorney Brandon T. Crowther added to party J. Nielsen(pty:dft), Attorney Brandon T. Crowther added to party Ogden City(pty:dft), Attorney Brandon T. Crowther added to party Ogden City Police Department(pty:dft), Attorney Brandon T. Crowther added to party D. Rentmeiste(pty:dft), Attorney Brandon T. Crowther added to party Devin Taylor(pty:dft)(Crowther, Brandon) |
| Filing 18 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Sylvester Bradford as to Ogden City. (kpf) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sylvester Bradford. Summons served on Sylvester Bradford, T. Dupre, J. Gerfen, J. Nielsen, D. Rentmeiste, Devin Taylor, on 04/4/2024. (kpf) |
| Filing 16 Remark USMS packet has been forwarded to the Marshal's for process per dkt #6 . (sg) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to J. Nielsen. (sg) |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to J. Gerfen. (sg) |
| Filing 13 Summons Issued as to T. Dupre. (sg) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Ogden City. (sg) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Devin Taylor. (sg) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to D. Rentmeiste. (sg) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against T. Dupre, J. Gerfen, J. Nielsen, Ogden City, D. Rentmeiste, Devin Taylor with Jury Demand. Ogden City Police Department (by through Ogden City) terminated per Amended Complaint. Filed by Sylvester Bradford. (eat) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-4 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Dale A. Kimball and Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. (mh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Sylvester Bradford. (alf) |
Filing 6
ORDER for Service of Process by USMS. Completed summons and service of process forms for each defendant due to the Clerk's Office by 4/12/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 3/12/2024. (alf)
|
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT against Ogden City, Ogden City Police Department, Devin Taylor (Originally received by the court on 02/27/2024). (Fee Status: IFP) filed by Slyvester Bradford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg (sg) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/7/2024: #2 with OCR) (kb). |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. 1. Because Mr. Bradford is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (without paying the filing fee), the court will screen his complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and Local Civil Rule DUCivR 3-2(b). 2. Mr. Bradford may complete and return forms provided by the court. The clerks office is directed to provide Mr. Bradford with the email filing and electronic notification form for unrepresented parties. 3. Other than court forms, Mr. Bradford must not file any motions or other documents during the time the case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. If such documents are filed, they will be lodged on the docket and will not be addressed until screening is completed. 4. The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. 5. If the action is allowed to proceed, the court will order service of process on the defendant(s). Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 02/29/2024. (sg)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at consents@utd.uscourts.gov or mail at the address on the form and place Attention: Consent Clerk on the envelope. Please do not e-file the Consent Form in the case. Notice e-mailed or mailed to Plaintiff Slyvester Bradford. Form due by 3/20/2024. (mh) |
| Filing 2 DOCUMENTS LODGED consisting of Complaint and Civil Cover Sheet. Note: attached document lodged for reference purposes only; no response required unless specifically ordered by the court. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kec) |
| Filing 1 **SEALED DOCUMENT** MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg for review, case file forwarded to Magistrate Judge. (Received by the court on: 02/27/2024) filed by Plaintiff Slyvester Bradford. (kec) Modified on 2/28/2024 (kec). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
