Moore et al v. Be Diamond et al
| Michael Moore and M. M., II |
| Mikhail Karaim and Be Diamond |
| 1:2025cv00004 |
| January 9, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Ann Marie McIff Allen |
| Dustin B Pead |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE FROM THE COURT. On March 5, 2025, the parties filed their #8 Stipulation of Dismissal. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the stipulated dismissal is self-effectuating. The case is dismissed with prejudice per the terms of the stipulated dismissal and the parties will bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. No order will follow. (sem) |
| Filing 9 Modification of Docket re #8 : MOTION to Dismiss event added to entry per pleading. No further action needed. (mh) |
| Filing 8 MOTION and STIPULATION of Dismissal by Be Diamond, Mikhail Karaim. (Stoddard, Bryan) Modified by adding motion event and text per pleading on 3/6/2025 (mh). |
Filing 7
ORDER TO FILE DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 7.1 - See order for details. Signed by District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen on 2/22/2025. (mh)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint filed by Be Diamond, Mikhail Karaim.(Stoddard, Bryan) |
|
Filing 5
DOCKET TEXT ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate Judge to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. No attached document. Signed by District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen on 1/10/2025. (pjd)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-4, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Defendants Be Diamond, Mikhail Karaim. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 1/30/2025. (sg) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INELIGIBLE ATTORNEY -Attorney Tyler Webb, for Plaintiffs M. M., II, Michael Moore, has been notified that he/she is not in active status or has not been admitted to practice in this court and can not practice before this court. (sg) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 2nd District Court Weber County, case number 240908553, (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5293255) filed by Mikhail Karaim, Be Diamond. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Return of Service, Summons and Complaint) (Stoddard, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 Case has been indexed and assigned to District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen. Defendants Be Diamond, Mikhail Karaim is directed to E-File the Notice of Removal and cover sheet (found under Complaints and Other Initiating Documents) and pay the filing fee of $ 405.00 by the end of the business day.NOTE: The court will not have jurisdiction until the opening document is electronically filed and the filing fee paid in the CM/ECF system. (sg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
