Bracken v. Apopei et al
| Gary Bracken doing business as Noctis Corvus Music |
| Raul VD Apopei, Raul Apxpei, NDA Sound, Motion Collapse, Aurex and Wild Punches |
| 1:2026cv00075 |
| May 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Cecilia M Romero |
| Robert J Shelby |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0512 (h) Subpoena to Identify Copyright Infringer |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER temporarily granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The court will screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and DUCivR 3-2(b). Other than court forms, Plaintiff must not file any motions or other documents while the case is screened or until the court orders otherwise. If such documents or motions are filed, they will be lodged on the docket and will not be addressed until screening is completed. The time to serve the complaint is tolled until further order of the court. If the action is allowed to proceed, the court will enter an order authorizing service of process on the defendant(s). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 06/03/2026. (sg)
|
| Filing 7 Case randomly assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby per DTO 6 . Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero no longer assigned as the presiding judge to the case. Motions referred to Cecilia M. Romero.(sg) |
|
Filing 6
DOCKET TEXT ORDER FOR CASE TO BE REASSIGNED. Based upon the procedural posture of this case, the pending #5 Motion for Summary Judgment and the need to decide this motion in a judicious and timely manner, the undersigned orders that this case be reassigned to a district judge through random reassignment. No attached document. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero on 6/3/2026. (jfm)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Gary Bracken. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Damages, #2 Exhibit One Upon a December, #3 Exhibit Suno Unique Prompt, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit NEF Complaint, #6 Exhibit NEF IFP Motion, #7 Exhibit NEF Email Form, #8 Exhibit NEF Magistrate Assignment)(sg) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ASSIGNMENT - This case is assigned to a magistrate judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail to the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Gary Bracken. Form due by 6/16/2026. (alf) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Email Filing and Notification Form by Gary Bracken. (kop) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Received by the court on: 5/26/2026) filed by Plaintiff Gary Bracken. (kop) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raul VD Apopei, Aurex, Motion Collapse, NDA Sound, Wild Punches (Originally received by the court on 5/26/2026). (Fee Status: pending IFP) filed by Gary Bracken. Assigned to Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero. (kop) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/26/2026: #1 Civil Cover Sheet ) (kop). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
