Conway v. The City of Clearfield
| Jessie Conway |
| The City of Clearfield |
| 1:2026cv00212 |
| October 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Howard C Nielson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued Electronically as to The City of Clearfield. Instructions to Counsel:1. Click on the document number.2. If you are prompted for an ECF login, enter your 'Attorney' login to CM/ECF.3. Print the issued summons for service. (faf) |
| Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet (JS44) re #1 Complaint Civil Summons may be issued electronically. Prepare the summons using the courts #PDF version and email it to [email protected] for issuance, filed by Jessie Conway. (Jackson, Brian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re #1 Complaint. The document The Civil Cover Sheet is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule DUCivR3-1(a)(2). Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet JS44 immediately. (tjw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AVAILABILITY TO PRESIDE OVER CASE- Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, and DUCivR 72-3, you are hereby notified that a magistrate judge for the District of Utah may conduct any or all proceedings in this case, including a jury or bench trial and entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is permitted only if all parties voluntarily sign and return the form. To consent, return the Consent Form to the clerk's office within 21 days via email at [email protected] or mail at the address on the form. Please do not efile the Consent Form in the case. Notice emailed or mailed to Plaintiff Jessie Conway and Defendant The City of Clearfield. (Notice generated by Clerk's Office) Form due by 11/16/2026. (tjw) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE FROM THE COURT re #1 Complaint. Previous case assigned has been closed. All pleadings have been be transferred to this new case number. Case number will now read 1:26-cv-00212-HCN. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (tjw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The City of Clearfield Jessie Conway (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AUTDC-5961703) filed by Jessie Conway. (Jackson, Brian) Modified on 10/26/2026 to correct party names(tjw). |
| Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr added. Case number will now read 1:26-cv-00212-HCN. Please make changes to document captions accordingly. (tjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conway v. The City of Clearfield | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jessie Conway | |
| Represented By: | Brian K. Jackson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The City of Clearfield | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
