Kingston v. Nelson, et al
Case Number: 2:2004cv00156
Filed: February 11, 2004
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
Presiding Judge: Dee Benson
Presiding Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER - Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Carl shall pay a total of $3076.50 ($2942.00 in attorney fees and $134.50 in costs) to Defendants for the awards of reasonable expenses made in the 8/1 Order and in the instant Order. Carl shall file proof of that payment with the Court. Failure to make payment or file proof of payment in accordance with this Order may subject Carl to further sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 10/1/2008. (rlr)
September 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER denying 137 Motion to Set Aside 134 Order on Motion for Protective Order, Order on Motion to Compel, Order on Motion for Sanctions, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, Memorandum Decision. The Magistrate Judge's Order stands. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 9/13/2008. (rlr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kingston v. Nelson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?