Buck v. Myers et al
| 2:2005cv00876 |
| October 25, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Dee Benson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 144 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Allen Rand Myers, 142 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Paul Brenneman, John Thornton, Kim Cowley, N. M. D'Alesandro, Tracy Broughn, David E. Yocom, Scott Bannon, 164 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 08/05/2010. (asp)
|
|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying as moot 132 Motion to Vacate ; denying as moot 134 Motion to Add Parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 7/19/2010. (rlr)
|
|
Filing
154
ORDER granting 146 Motion to Proceed. In this motion to proceed the Plaintiff also requests this Court Order a special grand jury and independent prosecutor. Based on the arguments presented, however, this Court does not have authority to grant such relief. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 1/13/2010. (rlr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buck v. Myers et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
