K-TEC v. Vita-Mix
Case Number: 2:2006cv00108
Filed: February 6, 2006
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Presiding Judge: Paul M. Warner
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 907 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 898 Motion for Entry of Amended Judgment; denying 903 Motion to Amend/Correct taxed costs. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 5/18/11 (alt)
January 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 872 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 784 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 784 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 787 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 831 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 831 Motion for New Trial; denying 833 Motion to Strike; denying 835 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 835 Motion for New Trial; denying 837 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 837 Motion for New Trial; denying 839 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 839 Motion for New Trial; denying 841 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 841 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 1/26/11 (alt)
May 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 603 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part K-Tec's 464 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting in part and denying in part K-Tec's 468 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying Vita-Mix's 475 Motion for Summary Judgment. For complete details, see Memorandum Decision. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 5/26/2010. (ce)
May 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 591 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 473 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 541 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 5/24/10 (alt)
May 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 555 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 461 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 5/3/10 (alt)
April 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 543 ORDER granting 459 MOTION for Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Based on the So-Called "Miller Invention". The Miller Invention is not prior art and evidence and argument relating to the Miller Invention are excluded from trial. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 4/13/2010. (ce)
April 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 529 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 360 Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement; denying 339 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 471 Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement for the Second Vita-Mix Jar. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 4/6/10 (alt)
February 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 443 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 354 Motion for Summary Judgment (terminating 354 Motion to Dismiss); granting 356 Motion for Protective Order; granting 356 Motion to Quash; denying 379 Motion to Continue; denying as moot 381 Motion to Strike Request for Sanctions; denying 385 Motion for Entry of Default; denying 385 Motion for Default Judgment; denying as moot 428 Motion to Strike Answer to Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 2/2/10 (alt)
October 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 358 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION: the court accepts K-TECs proposed construction of truncated wall. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 10/23/09 (alt)
August 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 329 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 242 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 8/7/09 (alt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: K-TEC v. Vita-Mix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?