Abbott v. Mulligan et al
| 2:2006cv00593 |
| July 18, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Dee Benson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 101 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment or otherwise set aside the court's judgment confirming the arbitration award and for entry of judgment vacating the arbitration award. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 6/4/2010. (rlr)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM DECISION Denying 50 Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award filed by Counter Defendants Charles F. Abbott, Charles F. Abbott, Plaintiff Charles F. Abbott. Granting 66 Motion for Protective Order filed by Counter Defendant Charles F. Abbott, Plaintiff Charles F. Abbott. Granting in part and denying in part 69 Motion to Affirm Confirm Arbitration Award and to Sever and Enter Final Judgment on the Award filed by Defendant Patrick J. Mulligan, Counter Claimant Law Office of Patrick J Mulligan. For details, see Memorandum Decision. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 8/13/09. (ce)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Abbott v. Mulligan et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
