Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians, The et al v. Cason et al
| Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians, The and Private Fuel Storage |
| James E. Cason, Chad Calvert and United States Department of the Interior |
| 2:2007cv00526 |
| July 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Tooele |
| Ted Stewart |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 0702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER - the Court VACATES both the DOIs Calvert and its Cason RODs and REMANDS PFS right-of-way application and Plaintiffs lease to the DOI for further consideration consistent with this decision. The Court rejects Plaintiffs request, made for the fi rst time in their supplemental brief, that the Court retain jurisdiction during the administrative proceedings following remand. Therefore, because this order resolves all matters before the Court and because the Court does not intend to retain juris diction after remand, the Court will direct the clerk of the court to enter final judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. The Court is cognizant of Plaintiffs request for attorneys fees and will consider that request if reasserted in an appropriate post-judgment motion, see 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B). Signed by Senior Circuit Judge David M. Ebel on 7/26/2010. (ce)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
