Gibbons et al v. National Real Estate Investors et al
||Peter Gibbons and Else Donnell
||National Real Estate Investors, National Training Institute, Net Marketing Alliance, Creating Wealth Summit, Fruitland Development Group, Somersby Investments, Greg Howell, Derrick Betts and John Schofield
||December 21, 2007
||US District Court for the District of Utah
|Nature of Suit:
||Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 15, 2012
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order-Defendant Gregory K. Howell is hereby ordered to pay, as damages for his violation of federal and state securities law, $2,712,879.59 to Plaintiffs Gladys and Daniel Matthews and $807,915.79 to Plaintiffs Peter Gibbons and Else Donnell. To the extent Plaintiffs can recover from the judgment entered against Defendant Betts, the damages obligations of Defendant Howell will be offset. In addition, the court hereby orders that Plaintiffs outsta nding claims against Defendants Fruitland Development Group, LLC; Springwater Capital, LLC; Gregory K. Howell; and Does 1-25 be DISMISSED in accordance with Plaintiffs stipulation, see Pls. Resp. to Order to Show Cause 2-3 (Dkt. No. 213), and that FINAL JUDGMENT be entered in this case. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 8/14/12. (jmr)
|December 6, 2011
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order-granting 164 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 12/6/11. (jmr)
|March 23, 2011
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 146 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/23/2011. (jtj)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?