Pines v. EMC Mortgage Corporation et al
Michael Pines |
EMC Mortgage Corporation, Cal-Western Reconveyance, James H. Woodall, Experian Information Solutions, Equifax Information Services and Transunion |
2:2008cv00137 |
February 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Consumer Credit Office |
Salt Lake |
Tena Campbell |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 307 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 266 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 282 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 7/7/09 (alt) |
Filing 305 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION: denying 251 Motion to Dismiss; denying 251 Motion to Change Venue; granting 191 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 236 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 270 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying in part 266 Motion for Summary Judgment, reserving judgment as it concerns Defendants Cal-Western Reconveyance and Mr. Woodall; denying 260 Motion for Sanctions; denying as moot 295 Motion for Hearing; denying as moot 299 Motion to Strike. EMC is to submit an affidavit re: costs associated with defending the motion for Rule 11 Sanctions within 10 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 6/15/09 (alt) |
Filing 178 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 109 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 124 Motion for Leave to File; denying 152 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 1/16/09 (alt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.