USA v. Questar Gas Management
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Questar Gas Management
Case Number: 2:2008cv00167
Filed: February 29, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: David Nuffer
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 7413 (b) Clean Air Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 391 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 288 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 5/11/2011. (las)
December 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 343 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 175 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 12/13/2010. (asp)
October 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 297 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 196 Motion to Intervene. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 10/7/10 (alt)
July 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 250 ORDER granting 219 Motion to Dismiss Questar's Counterclaim ; granting 244 Emergency Motion to Vacate Preliminary Injunction for Lack of Federal Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 7-16-10. (sih)
July 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 223 ORDER granting 214 Questar's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 7-1-10. (sih)
May 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 185 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER granting 165 Motion to Amend/Correct; The parties are granted three months from the date of this Order in which to conduct discovery. Both Plaintiffs and Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED based on dispu ted issues of material fact. The one day bench trial in this matter, which is currently set for November 8, 2010, is vacated and reset for December 8, 2010, due to the courts extension of the discovery period and a scheduling conflict with a criminal trial set to be tried the first two weeks of November. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 05/03/2010. This document was docketed in the wrong case. It has the wrong case number on it. (kpf) Modified on 5/3/2010 (kpf).
April 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 172 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER denying 145 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 04/01/2010. (kpf)
March 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 163 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER denying 54 Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants Fourth Affirmative Defense; finding as moot 71 Motion to Strike Declaration of Cynthia K. Beeler. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 03/29/2010. (kpf)
January 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 142 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDERgranting in part and denying in part 88 Motion to Intervene; granting in part and denying in part 95 Motion to Strike Movant Plaintiff-Intervenor's Proposed Complaint. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 1/13/2010. (kpf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: USA v. Questar Gas Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: USA
Represented By: Daniel D. Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Questar Gas Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?