Taylor v. Young et al
| Jackie Taylor |
| Michael Young, University of Utah Office of Student Disability, Joe Pete Wilson, Sydney Davis, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Stacie Cummings and Don Uchida |
| 2:2008cv00177 |
| March 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Samuel Alba |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 26 Motion to Dismiss filed by University of Utah Office of Student Disability, Joe Pete Wilson, 34 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, Case Closed. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 9/29/2008. (rlr)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM DECISION and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 26 First MOTION to Dismiss filed by University of Utah Office of Student Disability, Joe Pete Wilson, 16 Amended Complaint, filed by Jackie Taylor. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint should be dismissed because the State of Utah is immune from suit on the allegations raised in this case under the ADA, and because individual defendants cannot be held liable for the alleged violations of the ADA. Magistrate Judge David Nuffer no longer assigned to case. Objections to R&R due by 9/24/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 9/10/2008. (rlr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
