Davis v. Morrell
Plaintiff: James Davis
Defendant: Donald Morrell
Case Number: 2:2008cv00234
Filed: March 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Samuel Alba
Presiding Judge: Ted Stewart
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER- granting 42 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 46 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer ; denying 30 Motion for Order to Show Cause. This case is CLOSED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 3/26/10. (mas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Morrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Morrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?