Bigelow v. Social Security Administration et al
Plaintiff: Irving K. Bigelow
Defendant: Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney and Utah Law Enforcement
Case Number: 2:2008cv00626
Filed: August 20, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Kimball
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 14 Report and Recommendations. Mr. Bigelow's Objection is DENIED and the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, Mr. Bigelow's Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Case Closed. Magistrate Judge David Nuffer no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 10/8/2008. (rlr)
September 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Complaint filed by Irving K. Bigelow. The Court lacks subject matter over Bigelow's claim against the Social Security Administration. Further, his claim against the State of Utah is barred by the Eleventh Amendm ent. Finally, the complaint fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted against the United States Attorney or "Law enforcement." Accordingly, Bigelow's Complaint should be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 9/19/2008. (rlr)
September 15, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Motion for TRO filed by Irving K. Bigelow, 11 Report and Recommendations. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining Order is DENIED. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 9/13/2008. (rlr)
September 9, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 10 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Irving K. Bigelow. The Motion for Temporary Restraining Order should be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 9/23/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 9/8/2008. (rlr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bigelow v. Social Security Administration et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irving K. Bigelow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Utah Law Enforcement
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?