In RE: Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Placeholder
Defendant: Defendant Placeholder
Case Number: 2:2008cv00976
Filed: December 19, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Marine Office
County: Kane
Presiding Judge: Ted Stewart
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1333 Admiralty

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 182 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE for lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction - Case Closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 4/11/2011. (las)
July 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 92 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 52 Motion to Set Aside ; granting 58 Motion to Enforce ; terminating 76 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/20/2010. (asp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In RE: Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Placeholder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Defendant Placeholder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?