In RE: Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services
Plaintiff Placeholder |
Defendant Placeholder |
2:2008cv00976 |
December 19, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Marine Office |
Kane |
Ted Stewart |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1333 Admiralty |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 182 OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE for lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction - Case Closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 4/11/2011. (las) |
Filing 92 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 52 Motion to Set Aside ; granting 58 Motion to Enforce ; terminating 76 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/20/2010. (asp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In RE: Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Plaintiff Placeholder | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Defendant Placeholder | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.