Homeworx Franchising v. Meadows et al
||January 7, 2009
||US District Court for the District of Utah
||Assault Libel & Slander Office
||Dale A. Kimball
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 17, 2010
ORDER ADOPTING 66 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: accordingly, 57 Motion to Dismiss is denied, 58 Motion for More Definite Statement is granted, and 62 Motion for Default Judgment is denied. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 11/17/10 (alt)
|October 14, 2010
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 62 MOTION for Default Judgment as to defendant(s) Counterdefendants Axis Pointe Inc and Blum Capital Partners, 58 MOTION for More Definite Statement, 57 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Counterclaim: magistrate judge recommends granting 58 Motion and denying 57 and 62 Motions. Objections to R&R due by 10/28/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 10/13/10 (alt)
|February 4, 2010
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER: granting 33 Amended Motion to join third parties as counter defendants; An amended answer and counterclaim that names the Proposed Counterclaim Defendants and serve said counterclaim in accordance with rule 4 of the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than February 24, 2010; finding as moot 22 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 29 Motion to Join Third Parties as Counterdefendants; finding as moot 30 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 02/03/2010. (kpf)
|January 26, 2009
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 1/26/09. (jwt)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?