Fatpipe Networks India v. Xroads Networks
| Fatpipe Networks India |
| Xroads Networks |
| 2:2009cv00186 |
| March 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Patent Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Dale A. Kimball |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 35:0271 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
514
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 450 Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Court's Order. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 1/10/13 (alt)
|
|
Filing
460
ORDER ADOPTING 438 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: Claim Construction. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 3/16/12 (alt)
|
|
Filing
449
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 418 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs: Fatpipe shall pay XRoads $62,148.65 for fees and expenses incurred in the motion for sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 3/6/12 (alt)
|
|
Filing
432
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 301 Motion for Sanctions; denying 301 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 341 Motion to Strike. XRoads is to submit a Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 1/23/12 (alt)
|
|
Filing
325
ORDER AFFIRMING 293 Order on Motion for Protective Order, Order on Motion for Leave to File, Memorandum Decision; AFFIRMING 294 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery, Memorandum Decision; DENYING 297 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court; DENYING 298 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. For details, see Order. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 5/9/2011. (ce)
|
|
Filing
294
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 266 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 288 Motion for Extension of Time to File Expert Reports. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 3/14/11 (alt)
|
|
Filing
230
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 155 Motion to Compel; denying 155 Motion for Sanctions. Additional responses ordered are due 28 days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on August 3, 2010. (DN)
|
|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 54 Motion for Scheduling Conference (schedule in this case is vacated); denying 81 Motion to Strike; denying 91 Motion for Hearing; Status Report and Scheduling Conference set for 2/24/2010 09:00 AM in Room 477 before Magistrate Judge David Nuffer. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 1/8/10 (alt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fatpipe Networks India v. Xroads Networks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Fatpipe Networks India | |
| Represented By: | Timothy B. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Xroads Networks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
