Center Capital v. Businessjet Leasing et al
Center Capital |
Businessjet Leasing, D&D Aviation, Richard A. Hopkins and Lynda J. Hopkins |
2:2009cv00406 |
May 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Utah |
Ted Stewart |
None |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 41 Motion for Default Judgment ; that within seven days of the entry of this Order, counsel shall submit the required stipulated scheduling order. Counsel shall jointly contact the undersigneds chambers to obtain a firm trial date for inclusion in their stipulated scheduling order. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 05/06/2010. (asp) |
Filing 35 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Without Prejudice; denying as moot the 29 Hopkins Defendants Motion for Rule 56(f) Discovery. Pursuant to this Court's standard policy, this case will be referred for a settlement conference by a separate order. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10/9/2009. (ce) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 21 Motion to Terminate Writ of Replevin. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/13/2009. (asp) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Granting 3 Motion for Writ:AUTHORIZING EX PARTE PREJUDGMENT WRIT OF REPLEVIN, NOTICE OF HEARING AND REQUIRING SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS AND PARTIES CLAIMING AN INTEREST (for reference see order 5 . Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 5/12/09. (ce) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.