Gascoigne v. Gascoigne et al
| Julie Gascoigne |
| Paul Gascoigne and Sandy Gascoigne |
| 2:2009cv00734 |
| August 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Dale A. Kimball |
| Paul M. Warner |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ordered that the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation dated June 8, 2010 is ADOPTED in its entirety, and Plaintiffs claims against Sandy Gascoigne are DISMISSED. Because Plaintiffs claims against Paul Gascoigne were previously dismissed, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 06/29/2010. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Paul Gascoigne, 13 Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ordered that the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation dated April 29, 2010 is ADOPTED in its entirety. Paul Gascoigne's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiffs claims against him are DISMISSED with prejudice. The court, however, declines to award sanctions. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 06/01/2010. (kpf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
