Patterson-UTI Drilling v. Tri-State Trucking
Plaintiff: Patterson-UTI Drilling
Defendant: Tri-State Trucking
Case Number: 2:2009cv01045
Filed: November 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Carbon
Presiding Judge: David Nuffer
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 96 MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 73 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 05/29/2012. (asp)
November 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER-granting 19 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Nuffer on 11/29/10. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson-UTI Drilling v. Tri-State Trucking
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patterson-UTI Drilling
Represented By: Rick L. Rose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tri-State Trucking
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?