Brooks v. Clerk of Third District Court
Vear LeRoy Brooks |
Clerk of Third District Court and State of Utah |
2:2010cv00001 |
January 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Salt Lake |
Bruce S. Jenkins |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 SECOND ORDER TO AMEND DEFICIENT COMPLAINT- IT IS ORDERED that (1) Plaintiff shall have THIRTY (30) days from the date of this order to cure the deficiencies. (2) The Clerk's Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide. (3) If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according to the instructions here this action will be dismissed without further notice. (4) denying 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; (5) denying 10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Mailed Pro Se Litigant Guide to Plaintiff). Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 2/22/2011. (mas) |
Filing 9 ORDER TO AMEND DEFICIENT COMPLAINT- IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff shall have THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this order to cure the deficiencies noted; (2) the Clerk's Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide; (3) if Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according to the instructions here, this action will be dismissed without further notice; and, (4) Plaintiff's motion for summary disposition is DENIED. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 04/06/10. (mas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.