Kartiganer v. Juab County et al
| Adam Kartiganer |
| Juab County, Hoby Metz, May Automotive Towing and Rodney G. Marrelli |
| 2:2010cv00842 |
| August 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM DECISION-Approves and Adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Alba; and dismisses all other claims in the complaint with prejudice. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/21/14. (jmr)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 49 Report and Recommendations, 7 Amended Complaint filed by Adam Kartiganer. Plaintiff may move for leave to amend his complaint to satisfy the pleading deficiencies as otherwise outlined in the report and recommendation. The motion shall be filed, with the amended complaint attached, on or before June 15, 2012. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 05/25/2012. (asp)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERdenying 39 Motion ; denying 42 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 11/7/11. (jmr)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER-granting 10 Motion to Dismiss Party. May Automotive Towing terminated. ; denying 12 Motion to Quash; denying 12 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 14 Motion to Dismiss Party. ; denying 14 Motion to Quash. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 10/17/11. (jmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
