Bird v. Winterfox LLC
Appellant: J. Kevin Bird
Appellee: Winterfox LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv00233
Filed: March 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Tena Campbell
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part, Vacating and Remanding in Part the Bankruptcy Court's 2/8/11 Order; denying as moot 27 MOTION to Strike 26 Appellee's Brief (Portions). Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 1/13/12 (alt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bird v. Winterfox LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: J. Kevin Bird
Represented By: James A. Boevers
Represented By: Adam S. Affleck
Represented By: Aaron B. Millar
Represented By: Michael N. Zundel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Winterfox LLC
Represented By: Mark E. Hindley
Represented By: David J. Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?