Kislyak v. McCleve et al
| Pavel Mark Kislyak |
| Sheila McCleve, Cynthia Vitko, FNU Sawiky, Mark Capell, Michael Ross, Brannon Fueling, Tawni Hanseen, SLC Correctional Facility, Leonid Kislyak, Grand America Hotel, Lyubov Kislyak and Gateway Mall Securities |
| 2:2011cv00359 |
| April 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| David Nuffer |
| Clark Waddoups |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM DECISION and DISMISSAL ORDER. It is therefore Ordered that Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), failure to follow Court orders, and failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/19/2012. (kpf)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER TO AMEND DEFICIENT COMPLAINT denying 6 Motion to obtain all records with the US Marshals; denying 7 Motion to obtain records from the state courts; denying 13 Motion to appoint US Marshal; denying 14 Motion t o Appoint Counsel; denying 15 Motion to change District Judge and Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff shall have THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order to cure the deficiencies noted above. The Clerk's Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/13/2012. (kpf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
