Estate of James D. Redd, M.D. v. Love et al
| Estate of James D. Redd, M.D. |
| Daniel Love, Dan Barnes, Brent Range, Lauren Good, Jon Edwards, Jennifer Vanderveer, David Kice, Selma Sierra, Juan Palma, Lynda Viti, Neil Rogers, Diane Eden Kisabeth, Gibson M. Wilson, Timothy Fuhrman, James McTighe and Seth Footlik |
| 2:2011cv00478 |
| May 27, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| San Juan |
| Ted Stewart |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDERgranting 93 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 12/11/2015. (jds)
|
Filing
76
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The court DISMISSES the first, second, fourth, and fifthcauses of action against Defendants. The court also DISMI SSES the excessive force allegation against Agent Barnes in Dr. Redds third cause of action. As all the causes of action against Agent Barnes are dismissed, the court DISMISSES Agent Barnes from the case. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 10/15/2014. (las)
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 43 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. It is ORDERED that the hearing in this matter currently set for June 14, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. is STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 06/11/2012. (tls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.