Moulton v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Bret Moulton
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Case Number: 2:2011cv00623
Filed: July 5, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Utah
Presiding Judge: Clark Waddoups
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 18 Report and Recommendations, 3 Complaint, filed by Bret Moulton. The Commissionersdecision is reversed and the plaintiffs case is remanded for reconsideration consistent with the issuesstated in the Report and Recommendation. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 6/19/12. (jmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moulton v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bret Moulton
Represented By: Natalie L. Bolli-Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?