Rich Media Club et al v. Mentchoukov et al
| Rich Media Club and Rich Media Worldwide |
| Nikolai Mentchoukov, James W. Rowan and Leftsnrights |
| 2:2011cv01202 |
| December 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Ted Stewart |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
201
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying without prejudice 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying without prejudice 5 Motion for Prejudgment Writ of Replevin. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/27/2012. (tls)
|
|
Filing
200
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER granting 198 Motion for Leave to File One-Page Sur-Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 07/26/2012. (tls)
|
|
Filing
192
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER denying 177 Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 07/09/2012. (tls)
|
|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 45 Motion to Quash; denying 45 Motion for Protective Order; denying 53 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 04/18/2012. (tls)
|
|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff shall have thirty days to file an amended complaint in conformity with this Order. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 04/03/2012. (asp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
