SIBU v. Bubbles
Plaintiff: SIBU
Defendant: Bubbles
Case Number: 2:2012cv00187
Filed: February 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Utah
Presiding Judge: Brooke C. Wells
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Amended MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order (amendment is to correct the attorneys listed on original memorandum decision). Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 7/30/12. (jlw)
July 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order granting 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 7/27/12. (jlw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SIBU v. Bubbles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SIBU
Represented By: Jason M. Kerr
Represented By: David R. Parkinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bubbles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?