Payton v. Salt Lake County Metro Jail et al
| Nathan John Payton |
| Salt Lake County Jail Health Services, Cantine LNU and Salt Lake County Metro Jail |
| 2:2012cv00391 |
| April 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Ted Stewart |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER & MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 4 Motion for Service of Process (Prisoner); denying 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Although the Court has already granted Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff must still eventual ly pay $350.00, the full amount of the filing fee. Plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee of $2.50 within thirty days of the date of this Order, or his complaint will be dismissed. Plaintiff must make monthly payments of twenty pe rcent of the preceding months income credited to Plaintiff's account. Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangement to give a copy of this Order to the inmate funds accounting office at Plaintiff's correctional facility. Plaintiff shall co mplete the consent to collection of fees and submit it to the inmate funds accounting office at Plaintiff's correctional facility and also submit a copy of the signed consent to this Court within thirty days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 6/12/2012. (kpf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
