Hutzler v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Tina Hutzler
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Case Number: 2:2012cv00512
Filed: May 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Tooele
Presiding Judge: Brooke C. Wells
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER granting 27 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees Under the EAJA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 01/17/14. (tls)
September 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER reversing and remanding this matter to the ALJ for consideration of Listing 1.02. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 9/9/13 (alt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hutzler v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Hutzler
Represented By: Natalie L. Bolli-Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?