Roundy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank
| Tiffany Farley Roundy and Brady Burke Roundy |
| Wells Fargo Bank |
| 2:2012cv01032 |
| November 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Utah |
| David Nuffer |
| Dustin B. Pead |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Negotiable Instrument |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 42 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 9/10/14 (alt)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER ADOPTING 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting 29 Motion to File Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs shall file the second amended complaint no later than 10 days after entry of this order. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/5/13 (alt)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to granting 36 Motion to Withdraw 28 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 10/7/13 (alt)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; finding as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting 11 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Plaintiffs must file their first amended complaint no later than 10 days from the date of this order. Plaintiffs may then either (1) file a substantive response to the motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, or (2) file a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 8/9/13 (alt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
