CAO Group v. Sybron Dental Specialities et al
| CAO Group |
| Sybron Dental Specialities and Kerr Corporation |
| 2:2012cv01062 |
| November 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Evelyn J. Furse |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 108 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 10/15/14 (alt)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part 78 Motion to Quash Subpeonas. The Court stays Van Cott, Farmer, and Ashton's deadlines to produce subpoenaed documents and to provide subpoenaed depositions until after Plaintiff provides Defendants with the privilege log and withholds privileged documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 4/3/14 (alt)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: Any claims for contributory infringement set forth in CAO's first amended complaint are dismissed without p rejudice. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint setting forth the requisite allegations to support any claims of contributory infringement on or before 1/31/14 or those claims will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 1/10/14 (alt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
