Stanger v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Defendant: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Craig Stanger
Case Number: 2:2013cv00218
Filed: March 25, 2013
Court: Utah District Court
Office: Central Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David Nuffer
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 25, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Granting 8 Motion to Change Venue to the District of Utah. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) [Transferred from Nevada on 3/26/2013.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stanger v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Represented By: Joseph J. Joyce
Represented By: Ryan J. Schriever
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Stanger
Represented By: Matthew R. Vannah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.